<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Margarite Helena Zoeteweij | nccr – on the move</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/author/zoeteweij/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Dublin Regulation: Mutual Trust… or Joint Liability?</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/dublin-regulation-mutual-trust-or-joint-liability/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/dublin-regulation-mutual-trust-or-joint-liability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margarite Helena Zoeteweij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 07:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schengen/Dublin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum + refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law + case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=4002</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Dublin III Regulation is based on the principle of mutual trust. This means that Member States’ authorities assume that European and international law is correctly applied to asylum seekers in the other Member States. Practice shows, however, that the asylum systems of some of the Dublin states are riddled</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/dublin-regulation-mutual-trust-or-joint-liability/">Dublin Regulation: Mutual Trust… or Joint Liability?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/dublin-regulation-mutual-trust-or-joint-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning: Contains Traces of Gender-Discrimination</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/warning-contains-traces-of-gender-discrimination/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/warning-contains-traces-of-gender-discrimination/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margarite Helena Zoeteweij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law + case law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=1470</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue of whether EU (labor) migration law respects the principle of gender equality as it is supposed to is so far understudied. This attempt of exposing some gender-related flaws in the EU migration law shortly discusses the gender-neutrality of the EU Blue Card Directive and the Seasonal Workers Directive as two examples of EU migration law. And, it is used as evidence that the EU asylum and migration law does indeed contain traces of gender-discrimination.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/warning-contains-traces-of-gender-discrimination/">Warning: Contains Traces of Gender-Discrimination</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/warning-contains-traces-of-gender-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The EU-Turkey Deal on Refugees: “No Big Deal”?</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-eu-turkey-deal-on-refugees-no-big-deal/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-eu-turkey-deal-on-refugees-no-big-deal/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margarite Helena Zoeteweij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum + refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[removal + detention]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On 4 April 2016, a group of around 197 migrants and refugees was returned to Turkey as part of the “EU-Turkey deal on refugees”. A second group was returned four days later. The legal basis for these returns is a ‘deal’ between the European Council and its Turkish counterpart – and not the EU-Turkey readmission agreement, though both serve to send irregular migrants back to Turkey. What is the difference between them, and what is the ‘big deal’ actually all about?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-eu-turkey-deal-on-refugees-no-big-deal/">The EU-Turkey Deal on Refugees: “No Big Deal”?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-eu-turkey-deal-on-refugees-no-big-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expulsion, Readmission Agreements and ‘Non-Refoulement’</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/expulsion-readmission-agreements-and-non-refoulement/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/expulsion-readmission-agreements-and-non-refoulement/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margarite Helena Zoeteweij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[What do we mean by…]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum + refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law + case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[removal + detention]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Return, readmission, expulsion… these notions are often used in the same context, lately also when referring to the EU/Turkey deal that has attracted the (well-deserved) attention of the media. But what do we mean with ‘readmission’, and why could it be problematic from the point of view of international human rights and refugee law?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/expulsion-readmission-agreements-and-non-refoulement/">Expulsion, Readmission Agreements and ‘Non-Refoulement’</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/expulsion-readmission-agreements-and-non-refoulement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
