<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniela Vitiello | nccr – on the move</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/author/vitiello/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 21:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) – an Effective Instance of Multi-Level Governance or Catalyst for Externalization? (Part 2)</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/un-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-gcm-an-effective-instance-of-multi-level-governance-or-catalyst-for-externalization-part-2/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/un-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-gcm-an-effective-instance-of-multi-level-governance-or-catalyst-for-externalization-part-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniela Vitiello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law + case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy + research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=3913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the first part of this blog post, we analyzed why the GCM’s vision of ‘interconnecting’ migration-specific to migration-related policies delivers gains, including more room for negotiated outcomes, while at the same time increasing the risk of watering down human rights protection. This second part evaluates the evolution of institutions</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/un-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-gcm-an-effective-instance-of-multi-level-governance-or-catalyst-for-externalization-part-2/">UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) – an Effective Instance of Multi-Level Governance or Catalyst for Externalization? (Part 2)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/un-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-gcm-an-effective-instance-of-multi-level-governance-or-catalyst-for-externalization-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) – Towards a Legal Regime Governing International Migration? (Part 1)</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/un-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-gcm-towards-a-legal-regime-governing-international-migration-part-1/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/un-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-gcm-towards-a-legal-regime-governing-international-migration-part-1/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniela Vitiello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law + case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy + research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=3872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Does the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) fulfill the criteria of a legal regime for international migration or is it just another soft law cooperation framework? If the GCM is merely a state-led cooperation framework, then what is its contribution to international migration law (IML)?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/un-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-gcm-towards-a-legal-regime-governing-international-migration-part-1/">UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) – Towards a Legal Regime Governing International Migration? (Part 1)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/un-global-compact-for-safe-orderly-and-regular-migration-gcm-towards-a-legal-regime-governing-international-migration-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Relocation: The Contested Role of NGOs</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/beyond-relocation-the-contested-role-of-ngos/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/beyond-relocation-the-contested-role-of-ngos/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniela Vitiello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 11:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum + refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irregular migration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=2035</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The EU relocation mechanism for Italy and Greece promised to be the first fully-fledged experiment of “non-just-financial” solidarity among EU Member States in the field of asylum. After more than a year of implementation, its shortcomings appear as clear as the sun in the summer sky. However, it holds some merits, primarily to have shown the advantages of a better integration of NGOs in the governance of asylum redistributive schemes. The same NGOs are now under attack. Why?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/beyond-relocation-the-contested-role-of-ngos/">Beyond Relocation: The Contested Role of NGOs</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/beyond-relocation-the-contested-role-of-ngos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
