<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stefan Manser-Egli | nccr – on the move</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/author/manseregli/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 19:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Complicity of Culturalist Knowledge Production</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-complicity-of-culturalist-knowledge-production/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-complicity-of-culturalist-knowledge-production/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan Manser-Egli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reflexive Migration Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflexive migration studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[values]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nccr-onthemove.ch/blog/?p=8040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>‘Respecting the values of the constitution’ is one of the most recent requirements in Swiss integration law. In the last decades, academic voices reproducing narratives of ‘cultural distance’ have contributed to the emergence of the requirement and the conception of integration more broadly. Culturalist integration imaginaries have shaped and continue</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-complicity-of-culturalist-knowledge-production/">The Complicity of Culturalist Knowledge Production</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-complicity-of-culturalist-knowledge-production/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wie gelingt internationale Verantwortungsteilung? Asyl- und Klimapolitik im Vergleich</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/wie-gelingt-internationale-verantwortungsteilung-asyl-und-klimapolitik-im-vergleich/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/wie-gelingt-internationale-verantwortungsteilung-asyl-und-klimapolitik-im-vergleich/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan Manser-Egli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy + research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nccr-onthemove.ch/blog/?p=7263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Menschen auf der Flucht haben Anspruch auf humanitären Schutz in einem sicheren Land – doch welches Land soll dafür zuständig sein? In der Praxis sind bisherige Bemühungen gescheitert, verbindliche Regelungen zur gemeinsamen Verantwortungsteilung in der Asylpolitik zu etablieren. Ein Vergleich mit der internationalen Klimapolitik zeigt, wie ein wirksamer Rahmen aussehen</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/wie-gelingt-internationale-verantwortungsteilung-asyl-und-klimapolitik-im-vergleich/">Wie gelingt internationale Verantwortungsteilung? Asyl- und Klimapolitik im Vergleich</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/wie-gelingt-internationale-verantwortungsteilung-asyl-und-klimapolitik-im-vergleich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Responsibility-Sharing Operational: Comparing Asylum and Climate Governance</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/making-responsibility-sharing-operational-comparing-asylum-and-climate-governance/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/making-responsibility-sharing-operational-comparing-asylum-and-climate-governance/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan Manser-Egli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 07:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migration control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solidarity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nccr-onthemove.ch/blog/?p=7260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>International law demands that refugees obtain humanitarian protection in a safe country. However, which country should be responsible for which refugee remains a contested and unresolved question of international asylum governance &#8211; in particular in the event of refugee emergencies. Sharing the common responsibility of humanitarian protection is motivated by</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/making-responsibility-sharing-operational-comparing-asylum-and-climate-governance/">Making Responsibility-Sharing Operational: Comparing Asylum and Climate Governance</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/making-responsibility-sharing-operational-comparing-asylum-and-climate-governance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gendernativism in the (Il)Liberal State: The Burqa Ban in Switzerland</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/gendernativism-in-the-illiberal-state-the-burqa-ban-in-switzerland/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/gendernativism-in-the-illiberal-state-the-burqa-ban-in-switzerland/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan Manser-Egli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 08:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[votes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=6646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 7, the Swiss electorate will vote on the so-called ‘burqa ban’. This popular initiative as well as the counterproposal stand for what we call gendernativism; the idea that the ‘native’ Swiss are genuinely gender-equal and that only Swiss women can voluntarily wear the veil. The consequence is not</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/gendernativism-in-the-illiberal-state-the-burqa-ban-in-switzerland/">Gendernativism in the (Il)Liberal State: The Burqa Ban in Switzerland</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/gendernativism-in-the-illiberal-state-the-burqa-ban-in-switzerland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schengen-Dublin als öffentliches Gut eines integrierten Europas</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/schengen-dublin-als-offentliches-gut-eines-integrierten-europas/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/schengen-dublin-als-offentliches-gut-eines-integrierten-europas/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan Manser-Egli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 07:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schengen/Dublin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum + refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=4176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Die Schweiz partizipiert am europäischen Integrationsprozess, wenn auch nicht als Mitglied der Europäischen Union. Dies schafft funktionale Integrationszwänge, wie die Schengen/Dublin-Assoziierung verdeutlicht. Ein gemeinsamer Binnenmarkt und die Reisefreiheit in Europa sind öffentliche Güter, deren Herstellung und Aufrechterhaltung gemeinsame politische Regeln verlangen. Die Nicht-Übernahme der EU-Waffenrichtlinie durch die Schweiz wäre versuchtes</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/schengen-dublin-als-offentliches-gut-eines-integrierten-europas/">Schengen-Dublin als öffentliches Gut eines integrierten Europas</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/schengen-dublin-als-offentliches-gut-eines-integrierten-europas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
