<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Francesco Maiani | nccr – on the move</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/author/maiani/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 21:20:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Legal Perspectives on Im/mobility Regimes in Times of Crises</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/legal-perspectives-on-im-mobility-regimes-in-times-of-crises/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/legal-perspectives-on-im-mobility-regimes-in-times-of-crises/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesco Maiani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crises and (Im)mobility Regimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nccr-onthemove.ch/blog/?p=9670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When crises strike, the ability to move, or to be forced to stay, often comes down to legal status. Whether it is lockdowns during the pandemic, or the special protection offered to Ukrainian refugees, laws regulate who gets to cross borders, who has to stay in place, and under what</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/legal-perspectives-on-im-mobility-regimes-in-times-of-crises/">Legal Perspectives on Im/mobility Regimes in Times of Crises</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/legal-perspectives-on-im-mobility-regimes-in-times-of-crises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Has the European Court of Justice Shifted Toward a More Restrictive Position on Access to Welfare in Member States?</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/why-has-the-european-court-of-justice-shifted-toward-a-more-restrictive-position-on-access-to-welfare-in-member-states/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/why-has-the-european-court-of-justice-shifted-toward-a-more-restrictive-position-on-access-to-welfare-in-member-states/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesco Maiani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://nccr-onthemove.ch/blog/?p=6852</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a repost of blog contribution that was originally published at The Loop on 12 March 2021. From 2014, ECJ decisions on welfare access have departed significantly from previous case law. Angie Gago and Francesco Maiani analyse two Court dialogues, one with the EU legislator, the other with national</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/why-has-the-european-court-of-justice-shifted-toward-a-more-restrictive-position-on-access-to-welfare-in-member-states/">Why Has the European Court of Justice Shifted Toward a More Restrictive Position on Access to Welfare in Member States?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/why-has-the-european-court-of-justice-shifted-toward-a-more-restrictive-position-on-access-to-welfare-in-member-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The European Parliament and the Reform of the Dublin System: Bold but Pragmatic?</title>
		<link>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-european-parliament-and-the-reform-of-the-dublin-system-bold-but-pragmatic/</link>
					<comments>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-european-parliament-and-the-reform-of-the-dublin-system-bold-but-pragmatic/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesco Maiani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum + refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law + case law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nccr-onthemove.ch/?p=2489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A new chapter is being written in the troubled history of the Dublin system. (Hastily) declared dead at the height of the crisis’ of 2015, it has been (belatedly) judged unfit for purpose by a whole range of actors including the European Commission and Parliament. A fundamental reform has therefore been placed on the agenda as matter of urgency.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-european-parliament-and-the-reform-of-the-dublin-system-bold-but-pragmatic/">The European Parliament and the Reform of the Dublin System: Bold but Pragmatic?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://nccr-blog.flake.work">nccr – on the move</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://nccr-blog.flake.work/the-european-parliament-and-the-reform-of-the-dublin-system-bold-but-pragmatic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
